Proposition 2: No

There are many reason to dislike opposing this proposition. Our schools are horribly underfunded and facilities across the state at all levels are in desperate need of funds for maintenance and upgrades. Education is the foundation upon which we build a well-functioning society, and good facilities are necessary to provide a quality education.

But borrowing is just a bad bet.

The state already has a crushing amount of debt that it is committed to paying over the next years and decades. Taking on more, even for a cause as good as this, is a very sub-optimal choice.

And you know what I hate about this position even more? That it aligns with the utterly horrible Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

We definitely should commit, as a state and as a society, to funding this cause. And sadly, our politicians lack the courage to do what is necessary, to adjust a tax system that overwhelmingly favors the wealthy, both business and personal, to raise funds for this cause. That would be the optimal course of action, saving our state coffers for the need to pay even more debt.

The need is great, but the method is just plain irresponsible. We should be taxing to spend, not borrowing to spend. Ignore the tugs on your heartstrings and vote No on this measure.